Greetings Orwell Today Readers,

My incentive and motivation for creating the ORWELL TODAY website was fear and panic after reading 1984 and recognizing similarities in our time -- 25 years ago in 2000 -- and an irresistable need to warn people around me -- and ultimately the world. It was for this very same reason that ORWELL wrote 1984 -- he wanted to get the word out -- to get the truth out.

Orwell was very qualified to know the truth and tell the truth because he had pursued it all his life -- through independent research and a born-ability -- and a life of practice -- "to write prose as clear as a windowpane".

The most important message from 1984 is, "There was truth, and there was untruth" -- so much so it's literally etched around the edge of the coin recently issued by the Royal Mint to honour George Orwell on the 75th anniversary of his death. See ORWELL'S RIGHT ON THE MONEY

If I had to choose just one Orwellian danger that we, the proles, must wake up to -- and prevent at all cost -- it's the ongoing attack on Mother Earth and we, Her children, by the monstrous lie that Carbon Dioxide (CO2) is a pollutant. I've written extensively about this atrocity over the years. See DEFENDING CO2-OIL-GAS-COAL & CO2 SCAM PICS SAY THOUSAND WORDS & CO2-LIE BOOT ON LIFE'S FACE

Having read 1984 so many times to extract the most important themes -- of which I found 45 -- and reading everything else Orwell wrote and all the biographies -- my understanding of the man himself has metamorphosized. Originally I considered him an author -- then changed that opinion to journalist -- then ultimately changed it to "teacher". Now when I read Orwell, I just sit back and listen unquestionably as he explains what's going on -- knowing he doesn't have enough time left to go into details. Afterall, 1984 was Orwell's last book -- and he was dying and suffering the entire time he was writing it.

By the time I re-read 1984 in 1991 -- and then worked on creating the website for its birth on the internet in June 2000 -- I'd given up trusting any politician -- especially since if an honest one did come forth, he'd be physically or character assassinated -- or as Orwell said in describing the proles:

"...Heavy physical work, the care of home and children, petty quarrels with neighbours, films, football, beer, and above all, gambling, filled up the horizon of their minds. To keep them in control was not difficult. A few agents of the Thought Police moved always among them, spreading false rumours and marking down and eliminating the few individuals who were judged capable of becoming dangerous.... Speculations which might possibly induce a sceptical or rebellious attitude are killed in advance... Crimestop means the faculty of stopping short, as though by instinct, at the threshold of any dangerous thought. It includes the power of not grasping analogies, of failing to perceive logical errors, of misunderstanding the simplest arguments if they are inimical to Ingsoc, and of being bored or repelled by any train of thought which is capable of leading in a heretical direction. Crimestop, in short, means protective stupidity...."

I had no belief that the puppet-masters -- the shadow government behind the selected politicians -- could be overthrown militarily by the proles. We don't have a leader and we don't have the weapons to match their fire-power. I had no idea what we -- the people of the free Western World -- could do to avoid the tyranny described in 1984. That's why I came up with the plan to spread Orwell's truth, as best I could, in the hope that someone, somewhere would manifest our salvation. As Orwell always said, "If there was hope, it lies in the proles".

Ultimately I realized that the solution to finding the solution is "knowledge" -- or as Orwell said, "If you hate violence and don't believe in politics, the only major remedy remaining is education. Perhaps society is past praying for, but there is always hope for the individual human being". That's the quote I used on the occasion of REMEMBRANCE DAY 1999 when I held a public meeting entitled ORWELL EXPLAINED announcing the creation of my upcoming website. Above is the flyer I posted around town.

I must confess that over these past 25 years of updating the website "comparing the world Orwell described in 1984 with the world we are living in today" I've often felt like it's no use carrying on because, as Orwell said in the opening pages of 1984:

...He felt as though he were wandering in the forests of the sea bottom, lost in a monstrous world where he himself was the monster. He was alone. The past was dead, the future was unimaginable. What certainty had he that a single human creature now living was on his side? And what way of knowing that the dominion of the Party would not endure for ever ?... He wondered again for whom he was writing the diary. For the future, for the past -- for an age that might be imaginary. And in front of him there lay not death but annihilation. The diary would be reduced to ashes and himself to vapour. Only the Thought Police would read what he had written, before they wiped it out of existence and out of memory... He was a lonely ghost uttering a truth that nobody would ever hear. But so long as he uttered it, in some obscure way the continuity was not broken. It was not by making yourself heard but by staying sane that you carried on the human heritage...

When talking to people and asking them questions about "conspiracy theories" over the years -- like 9/11 and the physics of imploding buildings -- or the magic bullet that blew JFK's brains out -- or the moon landing with the flag waving -- or carbon dioxide being a pollutant -- or how we can't use our oil and coal and gas anymore but send it instead to Communist China for them to use -- I often get the same reaction Orwell described in 1984:

...In the ramifications of Party doctrine Julia had not the faintest interest. Whenever he began to talk of...the denial of objective reality...she became bored and confused and said that she never paid any attention to that kind of thing... If he persisted in talking of such subjects, she had a disconcerting habit of falling asleep. Talking to her, he realized how easy it was to present an appearance of orthodoxy while having no grasp whatever of what orthodoxy meant. In a way, the world-view of the Party imposed itself most successfully on people incapable of understanding it. They could be made to accept the most flagrant violations of reality, because they never fully grasped the enormity of what was demanded of them, and were not sufficiently interested in public events to notice what was happening. By lack of understanding they remained sane. They simply swallowed everything, and what they swallowed did them no harm, because it left no residue behind, just as a grain of corn will pass undigested through the body of a bird...

...He picked up the children's history book and looked at the portrait of BIG BROTHER which formed its frontspiece. The hypnotic eyes gazed into his own. It was as though some huge force were pressing down upon you - something that penetrated inside your skull, battering against your brain, frightening you out of your beliefs, persuading you, almost, to deny the evidence of your senses. In the end the Party would announce that two and two made five, and you would have to believe it.... The heresy of heresies was common sense. And they would kill you for thinking otherwise. The Party told you to reject the evidence of your eyes and ears....

...Sometimes he talked to Julia of the RECORDS DEPARTMENT and the impudent forgeries that he committed there. Such things did not appear to horrify her. She did not feel the abyss opening beneath her feet at the thought of lies becoming truths....

The purpose of the above preamble describing the apathy and ignorance of "we the sheople" in complying with the tyrannical agenda of the GLOBAL GOVERNMENT -- UNITED NATIONS -- BIG BROTHER -- is to prepare readers to recognize the lies and con job behind the CO2 hoax, as blatantly revealed in their UN manifesto transcribed below. I've bolded in black the key points, and highlighted in red the factual errors. I do this so people who won't read the entire article can acquire basic understanding by reading just those excerpts.

All the best,
Jackie Jura, May 2025

Put simply, net zero means we are not adding new emissions to the atmosphere. Emissions will continue, but will be balanced by absorbing an equivalent amount from the atmosphere. Practically every country has joined the Paris Agreement on climate change, which calls for keeping the global temperature to 1.5-degrees Celsius [34.7 Farenheit] above pre-industrial era levels. If we continue to pump out the emissions that cause climate change, however, temperatures will continue to rise well beyond 1.5 [34.7], to levels that threaten the lives and livelihoods of people everywhere. This is why a growing number of countries [not China or Russia or India] are making commitments to achieve carbon neutrality, or "net zero" emissions within the next few decades. It's a big task, requiring ambitious actions starting right now. Net zero by 2050 is the goal. But countries also need to demonstrate how they will get there. Efforts to reach net-zero must be complemented with adaptation and resilience measures, and the mobilization of climate financing for developing countries.

The good news is that the technology exists to reach net zero -- and it is affordable. A key element is powering economies with clean energy, replacing polluting coal -- and gas and oil-fired power stations -- with renewable energy sources, such as wind or solar farms. This would dramatically reduce carbon emissions. Plus, renewable energy is now not only cleaner, but often cheaper than fossil fuels. A wholesale switch to electric transport, powered by renewable energy, would also play a huge role in lowering emissions, with the added bonus of slashing air pollution in the world's major cities. Electric vehicles are rapidly becoming cheaper and more efficient, and many countries, including those committed to net zero, have proposed plans to phase out the sale of fossil-fuel powered cars. Other harmful emissions come from agriculture (livestock produce significant levels of methane, a greenhouse gas). These could be reduced drastically if we eat less meat and more plant-based foods. Here again, the signs are promising, such as the rising popularity of "plant-based meats" now being sold in major international fast-food chains.

Reducing emissions is extremely important. To get to net zero, we also need to find ways to remove carbon from the atmosphere. Here again, solutions are at hand. The most important have existed in nature for thousands of years. These "nature-based solutions" include forests, peatbogs, mangroves, soil and even underground seaweed forests, which are all highly efficient at absorbing carbon. This is why huge efforts are being made around the world to save forests, plant trees, and rehabilitate peat and mangrove areas, as well as to improve farming techniques.

We are all responsible as individuals, in terms of changing our habits and living in a way which is more sustainable, and which does less harm to the planet, making the kind of lifestyle changes which are highlighted in the UN'S [Big Brother's] Act Now campaign. The private sector also needs to get in on the act and it is doing so through the UN [Big Brother] Global Compact, which helps businesses to align with the UN's [Big Brother's] environmental and societal goals. It's clear, however, that the main driving force for change will be made at a national government level, such as through legislation and regulations to reduce emissions. Many governments are now moving in the right direction. By early 2021, countries representing more than 65 per cent of global carbon dioxide emissions and more than 70 per cent of the world economy, will have made ambitious commitments to carbon neutrality. The European Union, Japan and the Republic of Korea, together with more than 110 other countries, have pledged carbon neutrality by 2050; China says it will do so before 2060.

These commitments are important signals of good intentions to reach the goal, but must be backed by rapid and ambitious action. One important step is to provide detailed plans for action in nationally determined contributions or NDCs. These define targets and actions to reduce emissions within the next 5 to 10 years. They are critical to guide the right investments and attract enough finance. So far, 186 parties to the Paris Agreement have developed NDCs. This year, they are expected to submit new or updated plans demonstrating higher ambition and action. Click here to see the NDC registry.

Yes! Especially if every country, city, financial institution and company adopts realistic plans for transitioning to net zero emissions by 2050. The COVID-19 pandemic recovery could be an important and positive turning point. When economic stimulus packages kick in, there will be a genuine opportunity to promote renewable energy investments, smart buildings, green and public transport, and a whole range of other interventions that will help to slow climate change.

That's absolutely true. Major emitters, such as the G20 countries, which generate 80 per cent of carbon emissions, in particular, need to significantly increase their present levels of ambition and action. Also, keep in mind that far greater efforts are needed to build resilience in vulnerable countries and for the most vulnerable people; they do the least to cause climate change but bear the worst impacts. Resilience and adaptation action do not get the funding they need, however. Even as they pursue net zero, developed countries must deliver on their commitment to provide $100 billion dollars a year for mitigation, adaptation and resilience in developing countries.

The United Nations [Big Brother] supports a broader process of global consensus on climate goals through the Paris Agreement and the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. The UN [Big Brother] is a leading source of scientific findings and research on climate change. Within developing countries, the UN [Big Brother] assists governments with the practicalities of establishing and monitoring NDCs, and taking measures to adapt to climate change, such as by reducing disaster risks and establishing climate-smart agriculture.

STRANGE MUSK HITLER-HATER

Greenhouse gas emissions from a typical passenger vehicle, Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), March 31, 2025
How much tailpipe carbon dioxide (CO2) is created from burning one gallon of fuel? CO2 emissions from a gallon of gasoline: 8,887 grams CO2/gallon; from a gallon of diesel: 10,180 grams CO2/gallon... How much tailpipe carbon dioxide (CO2) is emitted from driving one mile? The average passenger vehicle emits about 400 grams of CO2 per mile... What is the average annual carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions of a typical passenger vehicle? A typical passenger vehicle emits about 4.6 metric tons of CO2 per year. This assumes the average gasoline vehicle on the road today has a fuel economy of about 22.2 miles per gallon and drives around 11,500 miles per year. Every gallon of gasoline burned creates about 8,887 grams of CO2...

ORWELL'S RIGHT ON THE MONEY

Angry Farmers Stirring Revolt (it's war between Greens & farmers), NewYorkTimes, March 2024
...There's no point talking about farm practices that help save the environment, if farmers cannot make a living. Ecology without an economy makes no sense... Farmers have blocked highways and descended on the streets of European capitals in a disruptive outburst against "existential challenges"... Europe's decision to open its doors to cheaper Ukrainian grain and poultry added to competitive problems... The E.U. has reduced subsidies to farmers if they do not shift to more environmentally friendly methods. Farmers have attacked Green party events... they spread a manure slick on a highway... Spanish farmers have destroyed Moroccan produce grown with cheaper labor. Polish farmers are enraged by what they see as unfair competition from Ukraine.... The cost for electrified irrigation more than doubled in 2023, and fertilizer costs tripled as the war in Ukraine increased energy prices... It's Russia's war in Ukraine that's destroying us... The Bugey nuclear plant could be seen belching steam into the blue sky. Urban development and industrial zones encroach on highly mechanized farms abutting deserted villages where small stores have been crushed by hypermarkets that offer cheaper imported meat and produce. "The graduates of elite schools that run this country have no idea about farm life, or even what a day's labor feels like. They're perched up there, the successors to our royal family, Macron chief among them... The countryside is the custodian of national traditions under assault from modernity, political correctness and immigration, in addition to a thicket of environmental rules that defies common sense.... "True exile is not to be banished from your country, but to live in it and no longer recognize it"... Close to 18 percent of French farmers live below the official poverty line, and 25 percent are struggling... The E.U.'s "Green Deal" and "Farm to Fork Strategy", which aim to halve chemical pesticide use and cut fertilizer use by 20 percent by 2030 as part of a plan to be carbon neutral by 2050, are a thinly disguised attack on the French economy.... A farmers' protest in January denounced politicians who exert control over people by "imposing things like climate ideology, gender madness and all that nonsense".... "It's war between the Greens and farmers. You don't bite the hand that feeds you.... Tariff-free imports from Ukraine -- where labor is even cheaper -- have given a sobering sense of what eventual Ukrainian membership in the E.U. would mean.... See LENIN BEHIND ENVIRONMENTALISM

COVID MASK-VAX OF THE BEAST = ARTIFICIAL INTELLIIGENCE